Animal welfare: Antispeciesism, veganism and a "life worth living" - CREM - Risques, Responsabilité, Comportement Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Social Choice and Welfare Année : 2021

Animal welfare: Antispeciesism, veganism and a "life worth living"

Nicolas Treich
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant

Résumé

While antispeciesism is an ethical notion, veganism is behavioral. In this paper, we examine the links between the two. Building on Blackorby and Donaldson (1992), we consider a two-species model in which humans consume animals. The level of antispeciesism is conceived as the weight on animals' welfare in the utilitarian social welfare function. We show that more antispeciesism increases meat consumption if and only if animals' utility is positive. That is, the critical condition is whether farm animals' lives are worth living. We then empirically explore this condition using a survey. We find that farm-animal experts and frequent meat eaters are more likely to believe that the lives of farm animals are worth living. We finally discuss some issues in the study of animal welfare in economics and social choice.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Antispeciesism.pdf (1.28 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-02945305 , version 1 (22-09-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Romain Espinosa, Nicolas Treich. Animal welfare: Antispeciesism, veganism and a "life worth living". Social Choice and Welfare, 2021, 56 (3), pp.531-548. ⟨10.1007/s00355-020-01287-7⟩. ⟨halshs-02945305⟩
308 Consultations
1222 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More