A. Bretman, M. Gage, and T. Chapman, Quick-change artists: male plastic behavioural responses to rivals, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.26, issue.9, pp.467-473, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.002

K. Karlsson, F. Eroukhmanoff, and E. Svensson, Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to the Social Environment: Effects of Density and Sex Ratio on Mating Behaviour Following Ecotype Divergence, PLoS ONE, vol.125, issue.9, p.20862332, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0012755.t002

S. Gray, S. Jensen, and J. Hurst, Effects of resource distribution on activity and territory defence in house mice, Mus domesticus, Animal Behaviour, vol.63, issue.3, pp.531-539, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/anbe.2001.1932

D. Armstrong, Aggressiveness of breeding territorial honeyeaters corresponds to seasonal changes in nectar availability, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.36, issue.46, pp.103-111, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00166484

N. Santangelo, M. Itzkowitz, and M. Richter, Resource attractiveness of the male beaugregory damselfish and his decision to court or defend, Behavioral Ecology, vol.13, issue.5, pp.676-681, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/beheco/13.5.676

A. Rypstra, A. Schlosser, P. Sutton, and M. Persons, Multimodal signalling: the relative importance of chemical and visual cues from females to the behaviour of male wolf spiders (Lycosidae), Animal Behaviour, vol.77, issue.4, pp.937-947, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.026

S. Chen, A. Lee, N. Bowens, R. Huber, and E. Kravitz, Fighting fruit flies: A model system for the study of aggression, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.99, issue.8, pp.5664-5668, 2002.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.082102599

M. Fernández and E. Kravitz, Aggression and courtship in Drosophila: pheromonal communication and sex recognition, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, vol.5, issue.10, pp.1065-1076, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s00359-013-0851-5

J. Billeter and J. Levine, Who is he and what is he to you? Recognition in Drosophila melanogaster, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol.23, issue.1, pp.17-23, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.009

B. Waldman, Mechanisms of kin recognition, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.128, issue.2, pp.159-185, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80167-4

R. Alexander, Epigenetic rules and Darwinian algorithms, Ethology and Sociobiology, vol.11, issue.4-5, pp.241-303, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0162-3095(90)90012-U

J. Mateo, Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition, Ann. Zool. Fennici, vol.41, pp.729-745, 2004.

A. Bretman, J. Westmancoat, M. Gage, and T. Chapman, Males Use Multiple, Redundant Cues to Detect Mating Rivals, Current Biology, vol.21, issue.7, pp.617-622, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.008

U. Candolin, The use of multiple cues in mate choice, Biological Reviews, vol.22, issue.4, pp.575-595, 2003.
DOI : 10.1086/285107

J. Barco-trillo and M. Ferkin, Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males, Nature, vol.43, pp.446-449, 2004.

X. Thibert-plante and S. Gavrilets, Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation, Ecology Letters, vol.2012, issue.Suppl, p.23782866, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/ele.12131

C. Spottiswoode and M. Stevens, Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.107, issue.19, pp.8672-8676, 2010.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0910486107

C. Huijbers, I. Nagelkerken, P. Lössbroek, I. Schulten, A. Siegenthaler et al., A test of the senses: Fish select novel habitats by responding to multiple cues, Ecology, vol.93, issue.1, pp.46-55, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s00338-009-0572-y

W. Kim, L. Jan, and Y. Jan, Contribution of visual and circadian neural circuits to memory for prolonged mating induced by rivals, Nature Neuroscience, vol.22, issue.6, pp.876-883, 2012.
DOI : 10.1038/nn.3104

A. Bretman, C. Fricke, and T. Chapman, Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.59, issue.3, pp.1705-1711, 2009.
DOI : 10.1098/rspb.2002.2260

A. Lizé, R. Doff, E. Smaller, Z. Lewis, and G. Hurst, Perception of male-male competition influences Drosophila copulation behaviour even in species where females rarely remate, Biology Letters, vol.47, issue.9, pp.35-38, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00070-1

T. Price, A. Lizé, M. Marcello, and A. Bretman, Experience of mating rivals causes males to modulate sperm transfer in the fly Drosophila pseudoobscura, Journal of Insect Physiology, vol.58, issue.12, pp.1669-1675, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.10.008
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01399748

S. Wigby, L. Sirot, J. Linklater, N. Buehner, F. Calboli et al., Seminal Fluid Protein Allocation and Male Reproductive Success, Current Biology, vol.19, issue.9, pp.751-757, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.036

M. Garbaczewska, J. Billeter, and J. Levine, Drosophila melanogaster males increase the number of sperm in their ejaculate when perceiving rival males, Journal of Insect Physiology, vol.59, issue.3, pp.306-310, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.08.016

A. Seetharam and G. Stuart, Whole genome phylogeny for 21 Drosophila species using predicted 2b- RAD fragments, PeerJ, vol.1, p.24432193, 2013.

J. David, P. Gibert, H. Legout, G. Pétavy, P. Capy et al., Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations, Heredity, vol.94, issue.1, pp.3-12, 2005.
DOI : 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800562
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427726

T. Price, Z. Lewis, D. Smith, G. Hurst, and N. Wedell, No evidence of mate discrimination against males carrying a sex ratio distorter in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.105, issue.4, pp.561-568, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00265-011-1304-1

T. Markow, O. Grady, and P. , Drosophila: A Guide to Species Identification and Use, 2005.

S. Pitnick, G. Spicer, and T. Markow, Phylogenetic Examination of Female Incorporation of Ejaculate in Drosophila, Evolution, vol.51, issue.3, pp.833-845, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/2411158

R. Ihaka and R. Gentleman, R: a language for data analysis and graphics, J Comput Graph Stat, vol.5, pp.299-314, 1996.

G. Box and D. Cox, An analysis of transformations, J R Stat Soc B, vol.26, pp.211-252, 1964.

A. Popov, A. Peresleni, E. Savvateeva-popova, R. Wolf, and M. Heisenberg, The role of the mushroom bodies and of the central complex of Drosophila melanogaster brain in the organization of courtship behaviour and communicative sound production, J Evol Biochem Phys, vol.40, pp.521-530, 2004.

A. Lizé, T. Price, C. Heys, Z. Lewis, and G. Hurst, Extreme cost of rivalry in a monandrous species: male-male interactions result in failure to acquire mates and reduced longevity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.1, issue.5451, p.24827446, 2014.
DOI : 10.1126/science.287.5451.308

G. Grether, The Neuroecology of Competitor Recognition, Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol.51, issue.5, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/icb/icr060

A. Lizé, T. Price, M. Marcello, E. Smaller, Z. Lewis et al., Males do not prolong copulation in response to competitor males in the polyandrous fly Drosophila bifasciata, Physiological Entomology, vol.19, issue.3, pp.227-232, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00836.x

M. Andersson, Sexual selection, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.11, issue.2, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1

B. Sinervo and C. Lively, The rock???paper???scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies, Nature, vol.380, issue.6571, pp.240-243, 1996.
DOI : 10.1038/380240a0

J. Jukema and T. Piersma, Permanent female mimics in a lekking shorebird, Biology Letters, vol.52, issue.2, pp.161-164, 2006.
DOI : 10.1006/anbe.1998.0792

T. Panuis and G. Wilkinson, Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.46, issue.4, pp.221-227, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/s002650050613

T. Turner and P. Miller, Investigating Natural Variation in Drosophila Courtship Song by the Evolve and Resequence Approach, Genetics, vol.191, issue.2, pp.633-642, 2012.
DOI : 10.1534/genetics.112.139337

P. Bourdeau, K. Pangle, E. Reed, and S. Peacor, Finely tuned response of native prey to an invasive predator in a freshwater system, Ecology, vol.94, issue.7, pp.1449-1455, 2013.
DOI : 10.1139/f02-087

C. Spottiswoode and M. Stevens, Host-Parasite Arms Races and Rapid Changes in Bird Egg Appearance, The American Naturalist, vol.179, issue.5, pp.633-648, 2012.
DOI : 10.1086/665031