S. E. Asch, Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements, Groups, leadership and men, pp.177-190, 1951.

P. Baepler, J. D. Walker, and M. Driessen, It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms, Computers & Education, vol.78, pp.227-236, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

D. Banks, Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, 2006.
DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2

B. J. Brooks and M. D. Koretsky, The Influence of Group Discussion on Students??? Responses and Confidence during Peer Instruction, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.88, issue.11, pp.1477-1484, 2011.
DOI : 10.1021/ed101066x

R. E. Corden, Group discussion and the importance of a shared perspective: learning from collaborative research, Qualitative Research, vol.1, issue.3, pp.347-367, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/146879410100100305

C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results, American Journal of Physics, vol.69, issue.9, pp.970-977, 2001.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1374249

C. H. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. P. Fagen, and E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once, Reviews in Physics Education Research, vol.1, issue.1, pp.40-95, 2007.

M. Dancy and C. Henderson, Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty, American Journal of Physics, vol.78, issue.10, pp.1056-1063, 2010.
DOI : 10.1119/1.3446763

M. Deutsch and H. B. Gerard, A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment., The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol.51, issue.3, pp.629-63610, 1955.
DOI : 10.1037/h0046408

P. Dillenbourg, M. Baker, A. Blaye, and C. Malley, The evolution of research on collaborative learning. Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, pp.189-211, 1996.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190626

W. Doise and G. Mugny, On the Social Development of the Intellect, 1984.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4684-4925-9_5

D. Drane, M. Micari, and G. Light, Students as teachers: effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years, Educational Research and Evaluation, vol.34, issue.3, pp.210-230, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

A. P. Fagen, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms, The Physics Teacher, vol.40, issue.4, pp.206-209, 2002.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1474140

J. W. Fantuzzo, R. E. Riggio, S. Connelly, and L. A. Dimeff, Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis., Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.81, issue.2, pp.173-177, 1989.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.173

S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. Mcdonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.8410-8415, 2014.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1319030111

S. Gielen, E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven, Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, pp.265-348, 2010.

P. Goodyear, C. Jones, and K. Thompson, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Instructional Approaches, Group Processes and Educational Designs, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_35

R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, vol.66, issue.1, pp.64-74, 1998.
DOI : 10.1119/1.18809

D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, pp.141-158, 1992.

S. C. Hockings, K. J. Deangelis, and R. F. Frey, Peer-Led Team Learning in General Chemistry: Implementation and Evaluation, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.85, issue.7, pp.990-99610, 1021.
DOI : 10.1021/ed085p990

M. C. James, The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction, American Journal of Physics, vol.74, issue.8, pp.689-691, 2006.
DOI : 10.1119/1.2198887

D. Johnson and R. Johnson, Cooperation and the use of technology, 2008.

J. Merrill, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp.1017-1044

M. E. Jones, P. D. Antonenko, and C. M. Greenwood, The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.39, issue.5, pp.477-487, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00470.x

D. B. King and S. Joshi, Gender Differences in the Use and Effectiveness of Personal Response Devices, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.6, issue.6, pp.544-552, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7

P. A. Kirschner, J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark, Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, Educational Psychologist, vol.21, issue.6, pp.41-75, 2006.
DOI : 10.1207/S15326985EP3802_4

L. Kobbe, A. Weinberger, P. Dillenbourg, A. Harrer, R. Hämäläinen et al., Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol.16, issue.1, pp.211-22410, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00703944

M. E. Lantz, The use of ???Clickers??? in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty?, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.26, issue.4, pp.556-561, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.014

N. Lasry, E. Mazur, and J. Watkins, Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college, American Journal of Physics, vol.76, issue.11, pp.1066-69, 2008.
DOI : 10.1119/1.2978182

N. Lasry, E. Charles, C. Whittaker, and M. Lautman, When Talking Is Better Than Staying Quiet, Proceedings from the Physics Education Research Conference, pp.181-184, 2009.
DOI : 10.1063/1.3266709

S. Lewis and J. E. Lewis, Departing from Lectures: An Evaluation of a Peer-Led Guided Inquiry Alternative, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.82, issue.1, pp.135-139, 2005.
DOI : 10.1021/ed082p135

G. Light and M. Micari, Making scientists: Six principles for effective college teaching, 2013.

M. Lorenzo, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom, American Journal of Physics, vol.74, issue.2, pp.118-122, 2006.
DOI : 10.1119/1.2162549

Y. Lou, P. Abrami, and S. Appolonia, Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.71, issue.3, pp.449-521, 2001.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543071003449

A. Lucas, Using Peer Instruction and I-Clickers to Enhance Student Participation in Calculus, PRIMUS, vol.7, issue.3, pp.219-23110, 1080.
DOI : 10.1080/10511970108965987

R. E. Mayer, A. Stull, K. Deleeuw, K. Almeroth, B. Bimber et al., Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.34, issue.1, pp.51-57, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002

J. Marx and K. Cummings, Normalized change, American Journal of Physics, vol.75, issue.1, 2007.
DOI : 10.1119/1.2372468

E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A user's manual series in educational innovation, 1997.

J. C. Mccroskey and M. J. Beatty, Communication apprehension and accumulated communication state anxiety experiences: A research note, Communication Monographs, vol.6, issue.1, pp.79-84, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3131-0.50006-8

M. Micari and P. Pazos, Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern intervention in small learning groups. Active Learning in Higher Education, pp.249-262, 2014.

J. Morice, N. Michinov, M. Delaval, A. Sideridou, and V. Ferrières, Comparing the effectiveness of Peer Instruction to individual learning during a chromatography course in a blended learning environment, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01224514

C. Orpen, Using the stepladder technique to improve team performance, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, vol.1, issue.3, pp.24-28, 1108.
DOI : 10.1108/13527599510084830

A. S. Palincsar and A. L. Brown, Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction, vol.1, pp.117-175, 1984.

M. Perlmutter, S. D. Behrend, F. Kuo, and A. Muller, Social influences on children's problem solving., Developmental Psychology, vol.25, issue.5, pp.744-754, 1989.
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.744

K. E. Perez, E. A. Strauss, N. Downey, A. Galbraith, R. Jeanne et al., Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction?, Cell Biology Education, vol.9, issue.2, pp.133-140, 2010.
DOI : 10.1187/cbe.09-11-0080

L. Porter, C. Bailey-lee, B. Simon, and D. Zingaro, Peer instruction, Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '11, pp.45-52, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/2016911.2016923

S. P. Rao and S. E. Dicarlo, Peer Instruction improves performance on quizzes Advances in Physiology Education, pp.51-55, 2000.

S. G. Rogelberg, J. L. Barnes-farrell, and C. A. Lowe, The stepladder technique: An alternative group structure facilitating effective group decision making., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.77, issue.5, pp.730-737, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.730

S. G. Rogelberg and M. S. Connor, Extending the Stepladder technique: An examination of self-paced Stepladder groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, pp.82-91, 1998.

S. G. Rogelberg, M. S. O-'connor, and M. Sederburg, Using the Stepladder technique to facilitate the performance of audioconferencing groups, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.87, 2002.

B. Rosenshine and C. Meister, Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research, Review of Educational Research, vol.64, issue.4, pp.479-530, 1994.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543064004479

C. Singh, Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance, American Journal of Physics, vol.73, issue.5, pp.446-451, 2005.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1858450

R. E. Slavin, Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning, Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, pp.344-360, 2011.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203839089.ch17

L. Springer, M. Stanne, and S. Donovan, Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.69, issue.1, pp.21-51, 1999.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543069001021

L. F. Thompson and M. D. Coovert, Stepping up to the challenge: A critical examination of face-to-face and computer-mediated team decision making., Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol.6, issue.1, pp.52-64, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.52

M. Van-zundert, D. Sluijsmans, and J. Van-merriënboer, Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 2010.

C. C. Wamser, Peer-Led Team Learning in Organic Chemistry: Effects on Student Performance, Success, and Persistence in the Course, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.83, issue.10, pp.1562-1566, 1021.
DOI : 10.1021/ed083p1562

J. Watkins and E. Mazur, Just-in-Time Teaching and Peer Instruction, Just in Time Teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy, pp.39-62, 2010.

K. Weber, C. Maher, A. Powell, and H. S. Lee, Learning opportunities from group discussions: warrants become the objects of debate, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.247-261, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8

A. Weinberger, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl, Fostering computer-supported collaboration with cooperation scripts and scaffolds, Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations of a CSCL community, pp.573-574, 2002.

J. R. Winquist and T. M. Franz, Does the Stepladder Technique improve group decision making? A series of failed replications., Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol.12, issue.4, pp.255-267, 2008.
DOI : 10.1037/1089-2699.12.4.255

D. Zingaro and L. Porter, Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention, Computers & Education, vol.71, pp.87-96, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.015