Active learning in a constructivist framework, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.63, issue.9, pp.349-36910, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00369153
Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements, 1951. ,
Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2
Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance, Computers & Education, vol.62, pp.102-110, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task., Psychological Bulletin, vol.119, issue.1, pp.111-137, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
The Influence of Group Discussion on Students??? Responses and Confidence during Peer Instruction, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.88, issue.11, pp.1477-1484, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ed101066x
Competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.15, pp.418-435, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/ejsp.631
Group discussion and the importance of a shared perspective: learning from collaborative research, Qualitative Research, vol.1, issue.3, pp.347-367, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1177/146879410100100305
Group versus individual performance: Are N?+?1 heads better than one?, Psychological Bulletin, vol.91, issue.3, pp.517-539, 1982. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517
Using the Personal Response Systems to Enhance Student Learning, Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, pp.140-154, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2.ch010
Cooperation and the use of technology, J. M. Spector, M, 2008. ,
Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp.1017-1044 ,
The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.39, issue.5, pp.477-487, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00470.x
The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.3, issue.4, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x
Gender Differences in the Use and Effectiveness of Personal Response Devices, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.6, issue.6, pp.544-552, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7
Staff Perspectives on the Use of Technology for Enabling Formative Assessment and Automated Feedback, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, vol.8, issue.2, pp.24-35, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.11120/ital.2009.08020024
Teaching More by Lecturing Less, Cell Biology Education, vol.4, issue.4, pp.298-310, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1187/05-06-0082
The use of ???Clickers??? in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty?, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.26, issue.4, pp.556-561, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.014
Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.37, issue.6, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
Social combination processes of cooperative problem solving groups on verbal intellective tasks, Progress in social psychology, pp.127-155, 1980. ,
Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.88, issue.2, pp.605-620, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00003-1
Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.22, issue.3, pp.177-189, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3
Social Loafing: A Field Investigation, Journal of Management, vol.23, issue.2, pp.285-304, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002
Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems, Psychometrika, vol.44, issue.2, pp.139-14810, 1955. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF02288986
Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom, American Journal of Physics, vol.74, issue.2, pp.118-122, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1119/1.2162549
Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.71, issue.3, pp.449-521, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.3102/00346543071003449
Using Peer Instruction and I-Clickers to Enhance Student Participation in Calculus, PRIMUS, vol.7, issue.3, pp.219-23110, 1080. ,
DOI : 10.1080/10511970108965987
The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students, 1981. ,
Mainstreaming Digest (pp. 109-113) College Park ,
A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol.9, issue.3, pp.187-195, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1039/B812407H
Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach, EDUCAUSE, vol.30, pp.71-74, 2007. ,
Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.34, issue.1, pp.51-57, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002
Peer Instruction: A user's manual series in educational innovation, 1997. ,
Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern 26, 2014. ,
Effective learning in science: The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences, Computers & Education, vol.56, issue.1, pp.36-43, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.021
Why individuals in larger teams perform worse, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.117, issue.1, pp.111-124, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.004
Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom, Studies in Higher Education, pp.458-473, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study, The Internet and Higher Education, vol.9, issue.4, pp.287-301, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.001
Social influence processes in group brainstorming., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.64, issue.4, pp.575-586, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575
Theorizing the transformed classroom sociocultural interpretation of the effects of audience response systems in higher education, 2006. ,
Social influences on children's problem solving., Developmental Psychology, vol.25, issue.5, pp.744-754, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.744
Gauging Students??? Understanding Through Interactive Lectures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3112, pp.234-243, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-27811-5_21
Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance, American Journal of Physics, vol.73, issue.5, pp.446-451, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1119/1.1858450
Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.69, issue.1, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.3102/00346543069001021
Group processes and productivity, 1972. ,
Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles, Computers & Education, vol.50, issue.3, pp.640-651, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.007
Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.3, issue.1, pp.22-47, 1958. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2390603
Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 1978. ,
Just-in-Time Teaching and Peer Instruction, Just in Time Teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy 28, 2010. ,
Learning opportunities from group discussions: warrants become the objects of debate, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.247-26110, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
Assimilation of new members in a large and a small church., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.55, issue.2, pp.151-156, 1971. ,
DOI : 10.1037/h0030705