G. Anthony, Active learning in a constructivist framework, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.63, issue.9, pp.349-36910, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00369153

S. E. Asch, Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements, 1951.

D. Banks, Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, 2006.
DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2

L. Blasco-arcas, I. Buil, B. Hernández-ortega, J. Seze, and F. , Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance, Computers & Education, vol.62, pp.102-110, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019

R. Bond and P. B. Smith, Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task., Psychological Bulletin, vol.119, issue.1, pp.111-137, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111

B. J. Brooks and M. D. Koretsky, The Influence of Group Discussion on Students??? Responses and Confidence during Peer Instruction, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.88, issue.11, pp.1477-1484, 2011.
DOI : 10.1021/ed101066x

C. Buchs, C. Pulfrey, F. Gabarrot, and F. Butera, Competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.15, pp.418-435, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/ejsp.631

R. E. Corden, Group discussion and the importance of a shared perspective: learning from collaborative research, Qualitative Research, vol.1, issue.3, pp.347-367, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/146879410100100305

G. W. Hill, Group versus individual performance: Are N?+?1 heads better than one?, Psychological Bulletin, vol.91, issue.3, pp.517-539, 1982.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517

K. Hinde and A. Hunt, Using the Personal Response Systems to Enhance Student Learning, Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, pp.140-154, 2006.
DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2.ch010

D. Johnson and R. Johnson, Cooperation and the use of technology, J. M. Spector, M, 2008.

D. Merrill and J. Van-merrienboer, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp.1017-1044

M. E. Jones, P. D. Antonenko, and C. M. Greenwood, The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.39, issue.5, pp.477-487, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00470.x

G. E. Kennedy and Q. I. Cutts, The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.3, issue.4, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x

D. B. King and S. Joshi, Gender Differences in the Use and Effectiveness of Personal Response Devices, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.6, issue.6, pp.544-552, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7

S. O. King and C. L. Robinson, Staff Perspectives on the Use of Technology for Enabling Formative Assessment and Automated Feedback, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, vol.8, issue.2, pp.24-35, 2009.
DOI : 10.11120/ital.2009.08020024

J. K. Knight and W. B. Wood, Teaching More by Lecturing Less, Cell Biology Education, vol.4, issue.4, pp.298-310, 2005.
DOI : 10.1187/05-06-0082

M. E. Lantz, The use of ???Clickers??? in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty?, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.26, issue.4, pp.556-561, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.014

B. Latané, K. Williams, and S. Harkins, Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.37, issue.6, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822

P. R. Laughlin, Social combination processes of cooperative problem solving groups on verbal intellective tasks, Progress in social psychology, pp.127-155, 1980.

P. R. Laughlin, B. L. Bonner, and A. G. Miner, Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.88, issue.2, pp.605-620, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00003-1

P. R. Laughlin and A. L. Ellis, Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.22, issue.3, pp.177-189, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3

R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, R. A. Jaworski, and N. Bennett, Social Loafing: A Field Investigation, Journal of Management, vol.23, issue.2, pp.285-304, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002

I. Lorge and H. Solomon, Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems, Psychometrika, vol.44, issue.2, pp.139-14810, 1955.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02288986

M. Lorenzo, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom, American Journal of Physics, vol.74, issue.2, pp.118-122, 2006.
DOI : 10.1119/1.2162549

Y. Lou, P. Abrami, and S. Appolonia, Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.71, issue.3, pp.449-521, 2001.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543071003449

A. Lucas, Using Peer Instruction and I-Clickers to Enhance Student Participation in Calculus, PRIMUS, vol.7, issue.3, pp.219-23110, 1080.
DOI : 10.1080/10511970108965987

F. T. Lyman, The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students, 1981.

. Anderson, Mainstreaming Digest (pp. 109-113) College Park

J. R. Macarthur and L. L. Jones, A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol.9, issue.3, pp.187-195, 2008.
DOI : 10.1039/B812407H

M. Martyn, Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach, EDUCAUSE, vol.30, pp.71-74, 2007.

R. E. Mayer, A. Stull, K. Deleeuw, K. Almeroth, B. Bimber et al., Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.34, issue.1, pp.51-57, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002

E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A user's manual series in educational innovation, 1997.

M. Micari and P. Pazos, Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern 26, 2014.

K. Moss and M. Crowley, Effective learning in science: The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences, Computers & Education, vol.56, issue.1, pp.36-43, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.021

J. S. Mueller, Why individuals in larger teams perform worse, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.117, issue.1, pp.111-124, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.004

D. J. Nicol and J. Boyle, Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom, Studies in Higher Education, pp.458-473, 2003.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345

K. Olapiriyakul and J. Scher, A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study, The Internet and Higher Education, vol.9, issue.4, pp.287-301, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.001

P. B. Paulus and M. T. Dzindolet, Social influence processes in group brainstorming., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.64, issue.4, pp.575-586, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575

W. R. Penuel, L. Abrahamson, and J. Roschelle, Theorizing the transformed classroom sociocultural interpretation of the effects of audience response systems in higher education, 2006.

M. Perlmutter, S. D. Behrend, F. Kuo, and A. Muller, Social influences on children's problem solving., Developmental Psychology, vol.25, issue.5, pp.744-754, 1989.
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.744

H. Purchase, C. Mitchell, and I. Ounis, Gauging Students??? Understanding Through Interactive Lectures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3112, pp.234-243, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-27811-5_21

C. Singh, Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance, American Journal of Physics, vol.73, issue.5, pp.446-451, 2005.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1858450

L. Springer, M. Stanne, and S. Donovan, Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.69, issue.1, 1999.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543069001021

I. D. Steiner, Group processes and productivity, 1972.

J. Stephenson, C. Brown, and D. Griffin, Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles, Computers & Education, vol.50, issue.3, pp.640-651, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.007

D. W. Taylor, P. C. Berry, and C. H. Block, Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.3, issue.1, pp.22-47, 1958.
DOI : 10.2307/2390603

L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 1978.

J. Watkins and E. Mazur, Just-in-Time Teaching and Peer Instruction, Just in Time Teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy 28, 2010.

K. Weber, C. Maher, A. Powell, and H. S. Lee, Learning opportunities from group discussions: warrants become the objects of debate, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.247-26110, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8

A. W. Wicker and A. Mehler, Assimilation of new members in a large and a small church., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.55, issue.2, pp.151-156, 1971.
DOI : 10.1037/h0030705