Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Violaine Smail-Faugeron (1, 2, 3) , Michèle Muller-Bolla (2) , Jean-Louis Sixou (4) , Frédéric Courson (3, 5, 2)

1 CRC - Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers
2 URB2i - EA 4462 - Unité de Recherche Biomatériaux Innovants et Interfaces
3 Service d'Odontologie [Bretonneau]
4 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes [CHU Rennes] = Rennes University Hospital [Ponchaillou]
5 Centre National de Référence des Maladies Rares du Métabolisme du Calcium et du Phosphore

INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthesia is commonly used in paediatric oral healthcare. Infiltration anaesthesia is the most frequently used, but recent developments in anaesthesia techniques have introduced an alternative: intraosseous anaesthesia. We propose to perform a split-mouth and parallel-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the pain caused by the insertion of the needle for the injection of conventional infiltration anaesthesia, and intraosseous anaesthesia by the computerised QuickSleeper system, in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria are patients 7-15 years old with at least 2 first permanent molars belonging to the same dental arch (for the split-mouth RCT) or with a first permanent molar (for the parallel-arm RCT) requiring conservative or endodontic treatment limited to pulpotomy. The setting of this study is the Department of Paediatric Dentistry at 3 University dental hospitals in France. The primary outcome measure will be pain reported by the patient on a visual analogue scale concerning the insertion of the needle and the injection/infiltration. Secondary outcomes are latency, need for additional anaesthesia during the treatment and pain felt during the treatment. We will use a computer-generated permuted-block randomisation sequence for allocation to anaesthesia groups. The random sequences will be stratified by centre (and by dental arch for the parallel-arm RCT). Only participants will be blinded to group assignment. Data will be analysed by the intent-to-treat principle. In all, 160 patients will be included (30 in the split-mouth RCT, 130 in the parallel-arm RCT). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee for the protection of people (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Ile de France I) and will be conducted in full accordance with accepted ethical principles. Findings will be reported in scientific publications and at research conferences, and in project summary papers for participants.

Mots clés: Adolescent; Anesthesia; Dental; Local; Child; Data Collection; Humans; Molar; Needles; ORAL MEDICINE; Pain; Pain Measurement; Patient Selection; Public Health; Sample Size; Tooth Diseases; Treatment Outcome

Domaines: Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Violaine Smail-Faugeron, Michèle Muller-Bolla, Jean-Louis Sixou, Frédéric Courson. Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 2015, 5 (7), pp.e007724. ⟨10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724⟩. ⟨hal-01301143⟩