. Sci, C. G. Technol, J. ?. Jaffredo, S. M. Carpentier, and . Guillaume, The molar mass, Polym. Chem, pp.46-6765, 2012.

P. Doi and . Sci, A Comprehensive Ref

A. Couffin, B. Martín?va-chem, J. ?. Lal, C. Carpentier, S. M. Guillaume et al., values of the initial PHB segment remaining 6, 5851. (a) N. Ajel nstant throughout the ROP of MLA Be , and the good agreement between M n,NMR and M n,theo values, as shown in Table 1, ruled out significant transesterification reactions. Also, the reasonable (Ð M = 1.23?1.50) values hinted the occurrence of some, yet limited, side reactions (typically 14, Macromolecules 2015 (e) S. Viel, M. Mazarin, R. Giordanengo, T. N. T. Phan, L. Charles, S. Caldarelli, D. Bertin, pp.161-133, 2009.

S. Cammas?marion, S. , Y. Chapurina, S. M. Guillaume, and J. G. ?f-c, 19. cannot be chain resonance (OCH(CO 2 CH 2 C 6 H 5 )CH 2 C(O),?? 5.52 ppm) is much lower than expected, regardless of the value of the rela?xation delay (increased up to 10 s), similarly to some spectra of the related PMLA Be ?n?ols, 11 and as opposed to PHB?b?PMLA Be copolymers 7 which featured a correct integral value. 16. Note th SEC analyses in THF (M n,SEC , Table 1) also fairly matched the PMLA Be ?b?PHB?b?PMLA Be M n,NMR and M n,theo data for the copo?lymers featuring short PMLA Be blocks. Indeed, M n,SEC of MLA Be ?enriched copolymers (ca. > 15 molar mass%) remained lower than the expected values, possibly reflecting the adsorption of these copolymers onto the columns. Such a behaviour was previously observed for related PMLA Be and PMLA Be /PHB (co)polymers, Surprisingly, the integral value of Be the PMLA methine main? at, pp.17-840, 1938.