B. Hammarfelt, Recognition and reward in the academy, Aslib Journal of Information Management, vol.62, issue.10, pp.607-630, 2017.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21588

W. Quan, C. B. Shu, and F. , Publish or impoverish, Aslib Journal of Information Management, vol.13, issue.2, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02163629
URL : http://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01162

D. Harley, S. Acord, S. Earl-novell, S. Lawrence, and C. King, Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. [Internet] UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education Available from: https://cshe.berkeley.edu/ publications/assessing-future-landscape-scholarly-communication-exploration-faculty-values-andneeds, 2010.

R. Walker, L. Sykes, B. Hemmelgarn, and H. Quan, Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment, BMC Medical Education, vol.11, issue.1, p.20214826, 2009.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.3.219

J. Tijdink, K. Schipper, L. Bouter, M. Pont, P. De-jonge et al., How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers, BMJ Open, vol.311, issue.2, pp.8681-26888726, 2016.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299

S. Sturmer, A. Oeberst, R. Trotschel, and O. Decker, Early-Career Researchers??? Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science, Social Psychology, vol.48, issue.6, pp.365-371, 2017.
DOI : 10.1027/1864-9335/a000324

E. Garfield, The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor, JAMA, vol.295, issue.1, pp.90-93, 2006.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.295.1.90

B. Brembs, K. Button, and M. Munafò, Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol.7, p.291, 2013.
DOI : 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291

G. Rouleau, Open Science at an institutional level: an interview with Guy Rouleau, Genome Biology, vol.18, issue.1, 2017.
DOI : 10.1186/s13059-017-1152-z
URL : https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13059-017-1152-z?site=genomebiology.biomedcentral.com

E. Mckiernan, Imagining the 'open' university: sharing to improve research and education, PLoS Biol, vol.15, issue.10, p.29065148, 2017.

S. Kleinert and R. Horton, How should medical science change?, The Lancet, vol.383, issue.9913, pp.197-205, 1016.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62678-1

C. Begley and L. Ellis, Raise standards for preclinical cancer research, Nature, vol.483, issue.7391, pp.531-534, 2012.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
URL : http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7391/pdf/483531a.pdf

J. Ioannidis, Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research, JAMA, vol.317, issue.10, pp.1019-1039, 2017.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2017.0549

P. Glasziou, D. Altman, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, M. Clarke et al., Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research, The Lancet, vol.383, issue.9913, pp.267-76, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X

A. Chan, F. Song, A. Vickers, T. Jefferson, K. Dickersin et al., Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research, The Lancet, vol.383, issue.9913, pp.257-66, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4533904?pdf=render

D. Heckathorn, Comment: Snowball versus Respondent-Driven Sampling, Sociological Methodology, vol.24, issue.1, pp.355-366, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01216.x
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3250988?pdf=render

A. Society, C. Biology, and . Dora, Declaration on Research Assessment

D. Hicks, P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. De-rijcke, and I. Rafols, Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature, vol.520, issue.7548, pp.429-460, 2015.
DOI : 10.1038/520429a
URL : http://www.nature.com:80/polopoly_fs/1.17351!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/520429a.pdf

J. Wilsdon, The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management.[Internet] University of Sussex Available from: blogs, 2015.

B. Alberts, R. Cicerone, S. Fienberg, A. Kamb, M. Mcnutt et al., Self-correction in science at work, Science, vol.2012, issue.6043, pp.1420-1422, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.013

V. Larivière, V. Kiermer, C. Maccallum, M. Mcnutt, M. Patterson et al., A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. bioRxiv. Available from: https

M. Cantor and S. Gero, The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers, Royal Society Open Science, vol.28, issue.34, pp.140540-26064609, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.004

M. Olfson, M. Wall, and C. Blanco, Incentivizing Data Sharing and Collaboration in Medical Research???The S-Index, JAMA Psychiatry, vol.74, issue.1, pp.5-6, 2017.
DOI : 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2610

D. Moher, S. Goodman, and J. Ioannidis, Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol.349, issue.5, pp.383-388, 2016.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.g7015

B. Brookshire, Blame bad science incentives for bad science. [Internet] https://www.sciencenews.org/ blog/scicurious/blame-bad-incentives-bad-science

B. Johnson, The road to the responsible research metrics forum Higher education funding council for England.[Internet] Available from: http://blog.hefce.ac.uk/2017/03/24/the-road-to-the-responsible- research-metrics-forum

E. Gadd, When are journal metrics useful? A balanced call for the contextualized and transparent use of all publication metrics. [Internet] LSE Impact Blog Available from, 222018.

E. Terama, M. Smallman, S. Lock, C. Johnson, and M. Austwick, Beyond Academia -Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework):e0168533. https, PLoS One, vol.11, issue.12, p.27997599, 2016.

D. Sayer, Five reasons why the REF is not fit for purpose. [Internet] The Gaurdian 2014 15 Dec Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2014/dec/15/research-excellence- framework-five-reasons-not-fit-for-purpose Last accessed, 222018.

. Of-science and D. Plos, Available at: https://www.plos.org/dora. Last Accessed: 15-Feb, 2018.

R. Burley, BioMed Central and SpringerOpen sign the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment . [Internet] Available at: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblogbiomed-central-and- springeropen-sign-the-san-francisco-declaration-on-research-assessment, pp.14-2018, 2017.

H. Bastian, Bias in Open Science Advocacy: The Case of Article Badges for Data Sharing, PLOS Blogs. Posted, 2017.

M. Kidwell, L. Lazarevi, E. Baranski, and T. Hardwicke, Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency, PLOS Biology, vol.69, issue.5, pp.14-27171007
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456.g005

B. Nosek and D. Lakens, Registered Reports, Social Psychology, vol.45, issue.3, pp.137-178, 2014.
DOI : 10.1027/1864-9335/a000192

J. Ioannidis, K. Boyack, and P. Wouters, Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize, PLOS Biology, vol.10, issue.5, pp.1002542-27599158, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542.t002
URL : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542

A. Janssens, M. Goodman, K. Powell, and M. Gwinn, A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), PLOS Biology, vol.178, issue.4060, p.28968388, 2017.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002536.s001

J. Ioannidis, R. Klavans, and K. Boyack, Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines, PLOS Biology, vol.112, issue.5, p.27367269, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501.s004
URL : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501

L. Boyer, Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate, p.152, 1990.

S. Lapinski, H. Piwowar, and J. Priem, Riding the crest of the altmetrics wave: How librarians can help prepare faculty for the next generation of research impact metrics, College & Research Libraries News, vol.74, issue.6, pp.292-300, 2013.
DOI : 10.5860/crln.74.6.8960

R. Zare, Editorial: Assessing Academic Researchers, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol.51, issue.30, pp.7338-7347, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/anie.201201011
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.201201011/pdf

P. Ovseiko, A. Chapple, L. Edmunds, and S. Ziebland, Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women???s and men???s perceptions, Health Research Policy and Systems, vol.383, issue.9913, pp.12-28222735, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5

R. Cwts-leiden, Responsible use. [Internet] Available from http://www.leidenranking.com/ information/responsibleuse. Last Accessed, 222018.

G. Pasterkamp, I. Hoefer, and B. Prakken, Lost in the citation valley, Nature Biotechnology, vol.19, issue.10, pp.1016-1018, 2016.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM200201313460515

B. Nosek, G. Alter, G. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. Bowman et al., Promoting an open research culture, Science, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1422-1425, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4550299?pdf=render

J. Ioannidis, Defending Biomedical Science in an Era of Threatened Funding, JAMA, vol.317, issue.24, pp.2483-2484, 2017.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2017.5811

A. Powell-smith and B. Goldacre, The TrialsTracker: Automated ongoing monitoring of failure to share clinical trial results by all major companies and research institutions, F1000Research, vol.5, pp.2629-28105310, 2016.
DOI : 10.12688/f1000research.10010.1

C. Coens, J. Bogaerts, and L. Collette, Comment on the ???TrialsTracker: Automated ongoing monitoring of failure to share clinical trial results by all major companies and research institutions???, F1000Research, vol.170, p.71, 2017.
DOI : 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.406

J. Flier, Faculty promotion must assess reproducibility, Nature, vol.549, issue.7671, pp.133-28905925, 2017.
DOI : 10.1038/549133a
URL : http://www.nature.com:80/polopoly_fs/1.22596!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/549133a.pdf

J. Mogil and M. Macleod, No publication without confirmation, Nature, vol.542, issue.7642, pp.409-411, 2017.
DOI : 10.1038/542409a
URL : http://www.nature.com:80/polopoly_fs/1.21509!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/542409a.pdf

E. Topol, Money back guarantees for non-reproducible results?, BMJ, vol.353, pp.2770-27221803, 2016.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.i2770

E. Terämä, M. Smallman, S. Lock, C. Johnson, and M. Austwick, Beyond Academia?Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework): e0168533. https, PLoS ONE, vol.11, issue.12, p.27997599, 2016.

C. Manville, M. Jones, M. Frearson, S. Castle-clarke, M. Henham et al., Preparing impact submissions for REF 2014: An evaluation: Findings and observations, 2015.

N. Gaind, Few UK universities have adopted rules against impact-factor abuse. [Internet] Nature 2018 Accessed from: https://www.nature.com/articles

H. Piwowar, J. Priem, V. Lariviere, J. Alperin, L. Matthias et al., The state of OA: a large scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles.[Internet] PeerJ Preprints Available from: https, 222018.

J. Odell, H. Coates, and K. Palmer, Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change, College & Research Libraries News, vol.77, issue.7, p.7, 2016.
DOI : 10.5860/crln.77.7.9518
URL : https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/1805/10343/1/322.full.pdf

K. Hemming, T. Haines, P. Chilton, A. Girling, and R. Lilford, The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting, BMJ, vol.350, issue.feb06 1, pp.391-25662947, 2015.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.h391
URL : http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/350/bmj.h391.full.pdf

E. Kontopantelis, T. Doran, D. Springate, I. Buchan, and D. Reeves, Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis, BMJ, vol.350, issue.jun09 5, pp.2750-26058820, 2015.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.h2750
URL : http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/350/bmj.h2750.full.pdf

N. Ivers, G. Jamtvedt, S. Flottorp, J. Young, J. Odgaard-jensen et al., Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol.79, issue.1, p.22696318, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2

M. Taylor, What impact does research have? [Internet] BMJ Opinion Available from: http://blogs.bmj. com/bmj, 2017.

M. Biagioli, Watch out for cheats in citation game, Nature, vol.535, issue.7611, pp.201-27411599, 2016.
DOI : 10.1038/535201a
URL : http://www.nature.com:80/polopoly_fs/1.20246!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/535201a.pdf

H. Piwowar, R. Day, and D. Fridsma, Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate): e308. https, PLoS ONE, vol.2, issue.3, p.17375194, 2007.
DOI : 10.1038/npre.2007.361.1
URL : https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2007.361.1