Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading proposed recommendations for international implementation

Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq (1, 2) , Jae Ro (3) , Jonathan Shanks , Steven Shen (3) , Toyonori Tsuzuki , Murali Varma , Thomas Wheeler , John Yaxley (4) , Lars Egevad (5) , John R Srigley (6) , Brett Delahunt (7) , Hemamali Samaratunga (4) , Athanase Billis (8) , Liang Cheng , David Clouston , Andrew Evans (9) , Bungo Furusato , James Kench (10) , Katia Leite (11) , Gregory Maclennan (12) , Holger Moch , Chin-Chen Pan

1 EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP]
2 Irset - Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail
3 Weill Medical College of Cornell University [New York]
4 University of Queensland [Brisbane]
5 Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm]
6 University of Toronto
7 University of Otago [Dunedin, Nouvelle-Zélande]
8 UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas = University of Campinas
9 University Health Network
10 The University of Sydney
11 USP - Universidade de São Paulo = University of São Paulo
12 Case Western Reserve University [Cleveland]

Keywords: ISUP grade; Prostate adenocarcinoma; International Society of Urological Pathology; Gleason; grading

Domains: Life Sciences [q-bio]

Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Jae Ro, Jonathan Shanks, Steven Shen, Toyonori Tsuzuki, et al.. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading proposed recommendations for international implementation. Pathology, 2019, 51 (5), pp.463-473. ⟨10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.001⟩. ⟨hal-02179387⟩