P. Marchetti, M. Jimenez-solomon, G. Szekely, and A. Livingston, Molecular Separation with Organic Solvent Nanofiltration: A Critical Review, Chem. Rev, vol.114, issue.21, p.10735, 2014.

M. G. Buonomenna and J. Bae, Organic Solvent Nanofiltration in Pharmaceutical Industry, Sep. Purif. Rev, vol.44, issue.2, p.157, 2015.

P. Vandezande, L. Gevers, and I. Vankelecom, Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level, Chem. Soc. Rev, vol.37, issue.2, p.365, 2008.

I. Vankelecom, Polymeric Membranes in Catalytic Reactors, Chem. Rev, vol.102, issue.10, p.3779, 2002.

L. Csera, T. Fodi, J. Kupai, G. Balogh, A. Garforth et al., Membraneassisted catalysis in organic media, Adv. Mater. Lett, vol.8, issue.12, p.1094, 2017.

L. Peeva, J. Da-silva-burgal, Z. Heckenast, F. Brazy, F. Cazenave et al., Continuous Consecutive Reactions with Inter-Reaction Solvent Exchange by Membrane Separation, Angew. Chem. Int, vol.55, issue.43, p.13576, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02103827

J. Dreimann, P. Lutze, M. Zagajewsky, A. Behr, A. Górak et al., Highly integrated reactor-separator systems for the recycling of homogeneous catalysts, Chem. Eng. Process, vol.99, p.124, 2016.

E. O'neal and K. Jensen, Continuous Nanofiltration and Recycle of a Metathesis Catalyst in a Microflow System, ChemCatChem, vol.6, issue.10, p.3004, 2014.

W. Siew, C. Ates, A. Merschaert, and A. Livingston, Efficient and productive asymmetric Michael addition: development of a highly enantioselective quinidine-based organocatalyst for homogeneous recycling via nanofiltration, Green Chem, vol.15, issue.3, p.663, 2013.

A. Cano-odena, P. Vandezande, D. Fournier, W. Van-camp, F. Du-prez et al., Solvent-resistant nanofiltration for product purification and catalyst recovery in click chemistry reactions, Chem. Weinh. Bergstr. Ger, vol.16, issue.3, p.1061, 2010.

S. Aerts, A. Buekenhoudt, H. Weyten, L. Gevers, I. Vankelecom et al., The use of solvent resistant nanofiltration in the recycling of the Co-Jacobsen catalyst in the hydrolytic kinetic resolution (HKR) of epoxides, J. Membr. Sci, vol.280, p.245, 2006.

P. Mertens, M. Bulut, L. Gevers, I. Vankelecom, P. Jacobs et al., Catalytic oxidation of 1,2-diols to ?-hydroxy-carboxylates with stabilized gold nanocolloids combined with a membrane-based catalyst separation, Catal. Lett, vol.102, issue.1-2, p.57, 2005.

J. Großeheilmann, H. Büttner, C. Kohrt, U. Kragl, and T. Werner, Recycling of phosphorus-based Organocatalysts by Organic Solvent Nanofiltration, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng, vol.3, p.2817, 2015.

P. Kisszekelyi, A. Alammar, J. Kupai, P. Huszthy, J. Barabas et al., Asymmetric synthesis with cinchonadecorated cyclodextrin in a continuous-flow membrane reactor, J. Catal, vol.371, p.255, 2019.

D. Ormerod, B. Bongers, W. Porto-carrero, S. Giegas, G. Vijt et al., Separation of metathesis catalysts and reaction products in flow reactors using organic solvent nanofiltration, RSC Adv, vol.3, issue.44, p.21501, 2013.

N. Razak, M. Shaharun, H. Mukhtar, and M. Taha, Separation of hydridocarbonyltris(triphenylphosphine) rhodium (I)catalyst using solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane, Sains Malays, vol.42, issue.4, p.515, 2013.

M. Shaharun and M. Taha, Nanofiltration of rhodium tris(triphenylphosphine) catalyst in ethyl acetate solution, Conference Proceedings, 2012.

M. Rabiller-baudry, G. Nasser, T. Renouard, D. Delaunay, and M. Camus, Comparison of two nanofiltration membrane reactors for a model reaction of olefin metathesis achieved in toluene, Sep. Purif. Technol, vol.116, p.46, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00841224

G. Nasser, T. Renouard, S. Shahane, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau et al., Interest of the Precatalyst Design for Olefin Metathesis Operating in a Discontinuous Nanofiltration Membrane Reactor, ChemPlusChem, vol.78, issue.7, p.728, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00918228

R. Goebel, M. Schreiber, V. Koleva, M. Horn, A. Gorak et al., On the reliability of lab-scale experiments for the determination of membrane specific flux measurements in organic solvent nanofiltration, Chem. Eng. Res. Des, vol.148, p.271, 2019.

A. Imbrogno and A. Schäfer, Comparative study of nanofiltration membrane characterization devices of different dimension and configuration (cross flow and dead end), J. Membr. Sci, vol.585, p.67, 2019.

G. Belfort, Membrane modules: comparison of different configurations using fluid mechanics, J. Membr. Sci, vol.35, issue.3, p.245, 1988.

V. Mavrov, N. Nikolov, M. Islam, and J. Nikolova, An investigation on the configuration of inserts in tubular ultrafiltration module to control concentration polarization, J. Membr. Sci, vol.75, issue.1-2, p.197, 1992.

Z. Ren, Y. Yang, W. Zhang, J. Liu, and H. Wang, Modeling study on the mass transfer of hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane: Effect of the hollow fiber module scale, J. Membr. Sci, vol.439, p.28, 2013.

A. Zydney and A. Xenopoulos, Improving dextran tests for ultrafiltration membranes: effect of device format, J. Membr. Sci, vol.291, p.180, 2007.

I. Tsibranska and B. Tylkowsky, Concentration of ethanolic extracts from Sideritis ssp. L. by nanofiltration: Comparison of dead-end and cross-flow modes, Food Bioprod. Process, vol.91, issue.2, p.169, 2013.

D. Patterson, L. Lau, C. Roengpithya, E. Gibbins, and A. Livingston, Membrane selectivity in the organic solvent nanofiltration of trialkylamine bases, Desalination, vol.218, issue.1-3, p.248, 2008.

B. Shi, D. Peshev, P. Marchetti, S. Zhang, and A. Livingston, Multi-scale modelling of OSN batch concentration with spiral-wound membrane modules using OSN Designer, Chem. Eng. Res. Des, vol.109, p.385, 2016.

N. Becht, D. Malik, and E. Tarleton, Evaluation and comparison of protein ultrafiltration test results: Dead-end stirred cell compared with a cross-flow system, Sep. Purif. Technol, vol.62, issue.1, p.228, 2008.

A. Randriamampianina, L. Elena, J. Fontaine, and R. Schiestel, Numerical prediction of laminar, transitional and turbulent flows in shrouded rotor-stator systems, Phys. Fluids, vol.9, issue.6, p.1696, 1997.

F. Cortés-juan, B. Balannec, and T. Renouard, CFD-assisted design improvement of a bench-scale nanofiltration cell, Sep. Purif. Technol, vol.82, p.177, 2011.

D. Dzhonova-atanasova, I. Tsibranska, and S. Vlaev, Flow behaviour in a membrane cross-flow filtration cell: experimental observations and CFD modelling, J. Chem. Technol. Metal, vol.52, issue.1, p.58, 2017.

J. Santos, V. Geraldes, S. Velizarov, and J. Crespo, Investigation of flow patterns and mass transfer in membrane module channels filled with flow-aligned spacers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), J. Membr. Sci, vol.305, issue.1-2, p.103, 2007.

M. Rabiller-baudry, . Diagne, and D. Lebordais, How the experimental knowledge of the irreversible fouling distribution can contribute to understand the fluid circulation in a spiral ultrafiltration membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol, vol.136, p.157, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01069494

K. Scott, Handbook of Industrial Membranes, 1stEd, 1995.

A. Shaabana, A. Hazefa, M. Abdel-fataha, N. Abdel-monemb, and M. Mahmoud, Process engineering optimization of nanofiltration unit for the treatment of textile plant effluent in view of solution diffusion model, Egyt. J. Petrol, vol.24, issue.1, p.79, 2016.

Z. Murphy and S. Gupta, Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model, Desalination, vol.109, issue.1, p.39, 1997.

T. Renouard, A. Lejeune, and M. Rabiller-baudry, Separation of solutes with an organic solvent nanofiltration cascade: Designs, simulations and systematic study of all configurations, Sep. Purif. Technol, vol.194, p.111, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01671608

A. Keraani, T. Renouard, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau, and M. Rabiller-baudry, Recovery of enlarged olefin metathesis catalysts by nanofiltration in an eco-friendly solvent, ChemSusChem, vol.1, issue.11, p.927, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00365032

A. Verliefde, E. Cornelissen, S. Heijman, E. Hoek, G. Amy et al., Influence of Solute?Membrane Affinity on Rejection of Uncharged Organic Solutes by Nanofiltration Membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol, vol.43, issue.7, p.2400, 2009.

S. Postel, C. Schneider, and M. Wessling, Solvent dependent solute solubility governs retention in silicone based organic solvent nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci, vol.497, p.47, 2016.